In my school we have recently been discussing the need for our students to be academically honest scholars. Many of them will go on to study at university and some of these students will complete post graduate research. One of the characteristics of a good scholar at any level is that they can show that they are well read and that they have utilised current research and thinking within the academic discipline they are studying.
Thus the use of citations or referencing in research work is essential. Most of us will never come up with completely new thinking in our academic discipline unless we go on to complete a doctorate. Even then these doctoral studies rely to a greater or lesser extent on ideas from scholars who have gone before.
For students at school this is all the more the case. They have to rely on the ideas and thinking of scholars who are more learned. Thus we need to brainwash our students into citing the sources of their research. The problem is that there are so many systems and personal preferences for the format of citations. These will vary between academic institutions and between faculties within institutions and between individual tutors within the faculty.
No system is any better than any other. In the end we choose the one that suits ourselves best as tutors and thus we load it on our students. Alternatively we look at past writing on the matter of citations and decide that we prefer the authoritative stance of a certain academic and we choose to align ourselves with their system.
Having scanned a number of systems on the internet and within texts of various types it seems that no one system of citiation could really be thought of as THE BEST. I wonder what some of you think about this?
Recent Comments